|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - July 16, 2002
Statement Concerning Public Policy on West Nile Disease Prevention
Resource Conservation Manitoba believes
that the following principles should be central to any plan that may
be developed in response to West Nile virus in Manitoba.
1. SUSTAINABILITY PRINCIPLE: The approach
to preventing West Nile disease in Manitoba must take into account the
cumulative, longer-term impacts of the combined measures adopted. In
short, the approach must be ecologically sustainable. While RCM recognizes
that decision-makers may feel pressed to take immediate and dramatic
action, we need to ask ourselves as a community about the environmental
impacts of the steps proposed. For example:
* Is it realistic
to rely on malathion fogging as a standard means of mosquito control
and West Nile virus prevention in Winnipeg? What does this actually
do to human and ecosystem health?
* Can the application
of malathion be done without harmful effect, year after year, at a scale
and intensity necessary to maintain mosquito populations at a level
low enough to prevent transmission of the illness to humans?
* What are
the cumulative effects of repeated exposures to synthetic chemical pesticides
on children? RCM notes that there is increasing evidence that use of
pesticides is associated with a range of health effects including respiratory
diseases, immune system disorders, endocrine system disruption, and
various developmental disorders. Is placing the health of children continually
at risk by using synthetic chemical pesticides an approach with which
our community feels comfortable?
* And not incidentally,
what happens when we are confronted with malathion-resistant populations
of mosquitoes? Are we confident that we are not already in that position?
Do we then resort to ever more dangerous and powerful chemical agents?
* What monitoring
and research are planned to identify, document and analyze the intended
and unintended effects of malathion fogging at the scale proposed?
* RCM is concerned
that the Province of Manitoba is embarking on a highly interventionist
course of action for which no environmental assessment has yet been
carried out or even planned.
2. PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE: Where the consequences
of interventions in ecosystems are unknown or uncertain, the Precautionary
Principle holds that decisions and actions should reflect conservative
assumptions about their possible impacts. Before intervening, program
proponents need to be in a position to anticipate and prevent adverse
environmental impacts. The widespread use of synthetic chemical pesticides
falls under this principle. As noted, evidence increasingly points to
a number of serious health risks for children, in particular.
How will Manitobans be better off if the continuing and expanded use
of pesticides leaves them with a higher incidence of illness (caused
by pesticides) than that associated with West Nile virus? It is notable
that the response plan last year in Ontario (where West Nile was identified
in both bird and mosquito populations) incorporated three main components:
public education, source reduction, and larviciding. There is no mention
of adulticiding with malathion or any other agent.
Manitoba is at an early stage in its experience with West Nile virus.
RCM emphasizes the need for thoughtful, measured responses by decision-makers
based on a commitment to sustainability and to the precautionary principle.
As a community, we need to ensure that the results of the West Nile
virus protection program will not be worse than the virus itself.
|